hi all. what if research into the interpretation of QM leads to a **QM + GR path/ direction for unification?** that is exactly the ambitious, overarching, but not inconceivable promise of the fluid paradigm of physics.

its been ~¾ a year since a last bold/ ambitious blog on **copenhagen interpretation** and new fluid ideas in quantum mechanics and physics.

at this point have blogged about ½ decade on some of these subjs and my neurons are really buzzing, crackling and snapping lately at full volume, the field is going thru an identifiable paradigm shift predicted years ago in this blog.

have collected a copious collection of new info/ leads, my links really runneth over. it really looks like nearly critical mass in some ways.

have been waiting to blog on this a few months and looking for an opportune moment. am expecting some massive signs to show up. many have already shown up. am finally deciding to write all this up at the near ½ year point.

one of the biggest signposts/ **BREAKTHRUS** is the new **Becker** book, *What is Real, the Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics.***[a]** havent bought it yet but its on the top of my to-read pile. this is causing big, maybe even massive waves in the mass/ popular media eg **NYT** but also the scientific journals such as **Nature**. its being reviewed by top experts positively. major response on social media such as **reddit** also. maybe a gamechanger.

have been participating very highly in **stackexchange** physics chat. as usual its a love + hate double edged sword, its significantly cost me some in terms of “flags + kicks + goodwill” some involving *rather extreme* “moderator” actions. its been a very volatile chat room lately and the mods are circling the wagons. they have recently suspended 2 top chat users for 1 year, **Duffield + 0celo7**.

**[i]**(during his brief return Duffield also discussed the miscarriage of his reddit shadow banning.) as my quote sections says,

*the pioneers are the ones with al the arrows in their backs.*another very longtime regular

**Balarka Sen**has rejected the “moderation” climate as too harsh and has announced his resignation from participation in the room in protest.

theres some new faces in the room and predominately `semiclassical`

has been very communicative and helpful, and somewhat aligned in ideological/ philosophical directions/ objectives, with strong affinity/ appreciation/ inclination/ attraction for **bohmian mechanics**, understanding of **kuhnian philosophy** etc., have had many very lively/ fruitful discussions over wideranging topics that have really directed/ freshened/ fueled/ energized/ inspired my thinking and even excitement, a huge highlight for me over the last ¾ year! (keeping me clear on the copernican revolution as a paradigm shift wrt epicycles theory, excellent/ premiere case study!)

`semiclassical`

is at UMN, **university of minnesota**, an apparently world class physics dept, apparently on the leading/ cutting edge of new research directions.**[b]** dont know who is the chairman or dept head or what, but their research directions are uncannily aligned with my own, and they have invited speakers that have profiled heavily in this blog, namely **Bush**. they are not afraid to invite brilliant popsci writers like **Gilder**, *Age of Entanglement,* and **Kaiser**, *How the Hippies Saved Physics.* even **Rigetti** of QM computing semi fame. `semiclassical`

has personally attended quite a few of these talks and reported 1sthand reactions on the chat line and interacted with the speakers eg personally asking Bush questions!

next/ then `semiclassical`

tipped me off to the brilliant physics-philosopher-historian **Bokulich** and some of her research, yet another UMN speaker. Bokulich has looked into deep history mostly lost in the sands of time such as the influence of fluid dynamics analogies on Maxwell. physics has mostly airbrushed away these old ideas. Duffield is a careful/ painstaking/ meticulous researcher into the “sands of time” aka intricacies of old physics literature and has quoted some of this himself such as “vorticity/ vortex model/ vortex sea” which doesnt appear a single time **Maxwells** current wikipedia biolography but shows up briefly on the article/ history on displacement current.**[i5]** remarkably to me, Maxwell had some very old ideas that relate to **cellular automata** theory of physics EM field/ space propagation

I conceived the rotating matter to be the substance of certain cells, divided from each other by cell-walls composed of particles which are very small compared with the cells, and that it is by the motions of these particles, and their tangential action on the substance in the cells, that the rotation is communicated from one cell to another.

these ideas are pursued in a more modern context in **[h]**. but basically to propose that EM waves (along with gravity waves) are “space fluid waves” is quite radical under current physics ideology. hence duffields multiple 1year physics suspensions… maybe now its clearer how am walking a fine line myself…

Bokulich is openly proposing physicists should seriously study the crosscutting **hydrodynamics analogy** wrt particles and spacetime. a brilliant, visionary thinker, not afraid to take a calculated/ scientific risk and walk out a bit on a professional limb! she has all kinds of understanding of contrarian thinking/ physics, and suspect has some excellent background in kuhnian theory.

another huge new acquaintance highlight for me last ¾ year is the extraordinary **Jarek Duda[c]**, with a CS + physics PHD and Msc math. hes one of the rare stackexchange users who has responded to an invitation to my own chat room and continued to appear occasionally. he uses the physics site to ask cutting edge physics questions and has some knack for not getting them closed/ downvoted, a rare skill that still eludes me even after ½ decade heavy participation on/ even deep sociological verging-on anthropological study of the site. jarek is a full fledged fluid paradigm advocate, attendant of the Emerging QM conference(s), producer of excellent slides on subj, and have never had the pleasure to chat with anyone directly on all this. really thrilling!

duda is investigating **Zitterbewegung**, old electron jitter ideas that go back to **de Broglie**, which is not a major area for current physics research, but does seem like it could be a wedge/ lever into new physics theory thats not explainable by standard QM theory.

so now the idea of **soliton-particles** while radical in some ways is being openly discussed in the **Emergent QM** literature/ conference by top experts.**[e][e5]** they are quite scattered however, and nobody is yet leading the charge. theres a lot of compartmentalization verging on disconnection wrt these ideas if you ask me.

QM field has been extremely lively with new cutting edge theory and experiments**[f][f2]** somewhat centered around weak measurement and other boundary-pushing areas such as mass/ large scale entanglement. the two-state vector formalism shows up as a possible new way of formulating QM that could lead to some super-QM understandings and maybe even predictions.

as pointed out in this blog before, it appears to me the QM concept of **“probability density”** the form of **“probability fluid”** may be a key way to understand the new paradigm. physicists only take this as an analogy, but it seems to play directly into the question of the **“reality of the wavefn” **which is apparently subject to increasing experimental study/ proof see eg very thorough recent survey by Shao 2017[f3.2]. another important key concept is **borns law** and how similar it is to other areas of physics such as energy density. can borns law somehow be derived in some new theory and not given merely as an axiom of QM?

from *Understanding Quantum Physics*, **Morrison [f.32]**

It is though there s a current of “probability fluid” that flows thru space. at any fixed time, the density of this fluid is largest where the particle is most likely to be found. this analogy is the basis of an extremely useful concept— the probability current density— which affords us new insights into quantum motion. (p214)

WARNING thou must not take probability fluid too seriously. probability fluid does not exist in real space; “probability flow” is colorful language designed to create in your mind a picture, an analog of the evolution of a quantum system.

(p216)

*(“dont take it too seriously”? sounds again like here there be dragons™!)*

there is some continued analysis of the **Bohr-Einstein-Bohm-Bell** ideas.[**f3]** a recent very high profile experiment was the **Mitchell** 100K bell gamer experiment.**[f4]** holy cow they sure got a lot of intense verging-on breathless popsci coverage for that one.

another key rosetta stone for this research is **madelung fluid**.**[g]** didnt really run across this until recently. it ties in fluid dynamics and navier-stokes eqns with the schroedinger eqn. a striking ref is **[g6]** by **de Cordoba** which proposes to derive plancks constant from fluid dynamics pov and think that experts **really** need to look at it more closely. (why? asked eg ACM in chat…) hint: **if theory A can derive a constant for theory B, theory A is more fundamental… when was the last time someone figured out how to derive plancks constant? its eyepopping at least for me, sounds like verging on nobel-quality stuff to me!**

As a physical model for the fluid itself we propose the quantum probability fluid. It turns out that the (state-dependent) viscosity of this fluid is proportional to Planck’s constant, while the volume density of entropy is proportional to Boltzmann’s constant.

now lately have been looking a little more into **GR/ gravity** and its interrelationship the fluid theory. it meshes quite nicely esp wrt **black hole** theory.**[k2]** there are remarkable new GR experiments. an old idea of **wheelers** called **geometrodynamics** is really not a whole lot different than the fluid/ soliton paradigm.

`semiclassical`

pointed me to **DeWitt** who worked with Wheeler and DeWitt did many early fluid dynamics computational experiments. a striking observation in the nice **Rickles** ref **[l5]** that is mostly unpublished elsewhere:

DeWitt was able to quantize the gravitational field without restricting himself to flat spacetime. The method, known as the ‘background field method’, invoked physical degrees of freedom (in this case, a stiff elastic medium, like a physical ether, and a field of clocks) to localize points, and there allow for the localization of physical quantities. The gravitational field is taken to interact with this background field.

Computationally, the approach marked a great advance. However, the background is unphysical in most realistic cases—but this highlights DeWitt’s (much like Feynman, and other physicists with war experience) focus on getting the job done, and computing numbers, over conceptual issues.

again we see here topic physicists taking the idea of an ether or space-fluid in their equations and calculations but not seriously otherwise. on some search it does not appear DeWitt wrote up these ideas in particular and think thats a huge loss bordering on shame! (maybe sort of a manifestation of the *huge/ deadly cost/ pitfall/ trap* of the widespread cultural attitude *“shut up and calculate” limitation/ thinking bias *which is a passive “sin of omission” ultimately anti-explanation and therefore *anti-progress/ unification/ science!*)[x]

on googling, there are a few new striking ideas on a supposed unifying **“superfluid”** theory of space but nobody seems to be connecting them to madelung fluid or soliton research.**[l2]** there is some fluid pov in gravity analysis.**[l3]**

my research is naturally sympathetic toward some more radical theories of gravity + spacetime namely **Verlinde + Magueijo**.**[l4][l5]**

⭐ ⭐ ⭐

finally, there is some consideration of the kuhnian shifting going on.**[m]** shifting is quite similar to **shearing**! and shearing can lead to tension/ stress/ occasional earthquakes. that is on full display in the physics chat room lately, but am hoping it decreases some myself. am trying not to push the envelope too far. humans can only take so much truth as a famous novelist once said (see my quotes).

the human biases are on full display. seriously trained phds/ scientists think they are free from bias but my observation is that theirs, maybe in much more ornate dressing, may be much more tenaciously held than laymen. have encountered a lot of strong reactionary pushback lately in the physics chatroom by cohorts who were previously more easygoing and openminded.

one of the biggest reactionaries of all, **“Lumo”** in a class of his own and *1+ decade* long blog, with colorful, spicy, biting, even caustic commentary on some of these areas.**[m2]** a brilliant, popular, and copious blogger, he is a deep expert in the quantum formalism, but he rejects any **super-QM ideologies** with a passionate intensity bordering on vitriolic and derogatory. his harsh/ stinging/ bitter/ shrill/ ridiculing words in some of these areas are increasingly bordering on desperate, not-intellectually-defensible rants. (in physics terms, yes… *unhinged.)* is this is the best/ main/ foremost proponent of copenhagen interptation these days? think grandfather-of-theory **Bohr** would *not* be either amused or proud…

honestly need to go thru all these sections more carefully/ thoroughly, esp trying to summarize cutting edge experiment directions, this is already ~250 links that could be pounded into further order, but already an unusually sizeable/ bordering on massive effort for me. its bigger than a 1man job. still looking for a few volunteers.

but the bottom line is that the fluid paradigm model of QM + physics is emerging, playing out, and it is a strong, epic unifying wave washing over these days, and the announcement of a massive paradigm shift taking place is fully/ strongly supported by all this very evidence.

was reminded of a semifamous quote on QM by **Feynman**, the brilliant pragmatist who mostly avoided pro/ con thinking on Copenhagen interpretation (barely ever referring to it directly) etc

We choose to examine a phenomenon [Double-slit experiment] which is impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery. We cannot make the mystery go away by “explaining” how it works. We will just tell you how it works. In telling you how it works we will have told you about the basic peculiarities of all quantum mechanics. —Feynman

The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Commemorative Issue, Vol. 3 Quantum Mechanics (1989) 1-1, “Quantum Behavior.”

it is not every day one can correct a nobel prize winning physicist, but that is the fundamental nature of science and progress. the nearly 1 decade old **Couder-Bush** experiments now refute the Feynman pov based on the fluid dynamics/ hydrodynamics pov. alas, most physicists apparently still havent gotten the bulletin/ newsflash! there is no major revision of textbooks going on so far.

⭐ ⭐ ⭐

ok, its a herculean goal to say the least, but realize need to flesh this out a little )( more to, even with all the copious supporting material, try to preemptively escape charges of that egregious/ villainous scientific/ physics crime, **mere handwaving**.[x] physicists *say* theyve been searching for decades, nearly a century, for **unification**. what does it mean? they regard it as a unification of forces and math, but it looks like what is staring us in the face is that a unification of crosscutting physics areas/ ideas/ concepts is needed, which are still largely studied in a **reductionistic** and therefore **compartmentalized** way. in other words, some currently distinct academic conventions need to melt away (if anyone seriously wants to really achieve the overarching goal). unify the formalism, unify the forces. these are all *currently thought* to be different phenomena but from the fluid pov they are all facets of the same reality. in short

*the supposed differences are currently due to human comprehensibility limitations/ bias, and many of the supposed bright lines/ distinctions separating these are really gray/ blurry/ artificial. ie some of the supposed strict boundaries are merely mental/ anthropomorphic/ historical artifacts[x] some built up over decades or even a *century* and need to be carefully/ painstakingly/ partially dismantled to succeed at the grand challenge.*

- quantum mechanics
- general relativity
- gravity waves
- light/ EM waves
- (“pilot wave”) hydrodynamics
- madelung fluid
- bohmian mechanics, implicate vs explicate order
- Bell experiments/ nonlocality measurements
- nonnewtonian fluid
- space as superfluid
- spacetime fabric
- singularities, “cosmic censorship”
- (particles as) solitons
- string theory
- QED/ QCD
- ether
- vortex model/ sea (Maxwell)

in other words, the **worlds largest jigsaw puzzle with all the pieces mostly scattered.** *need all hands on deck!* to try to unite two relevant western and eastern metaphors, this is all both **the elephant in the room, and the blind men and the elephant. its a massive modern form of a cascade/ myriad of epicycles and fluid pov is the underlying elliptical theory, the so called “hidden variable”.**

the other key issue is that in the last century, because of the ideological/ pedagogical rejection of the idea of an ether, and as vehemently insisted by JD meeting extreme sociological/ professional resistance, to some )( degree historically **the baby got thrown out with the bathwater.** but, *its not too late to save it.*

sounds radical? all these ideas are **clearly, undeniably connected,** and actually *very old* having been hypothesized for over a century even by some 19th century physicists *(thx JD!)*: eg Maxwell,

*1861!*[i8] + Clifford, 1876[i7]sounds impossible? without spelling out every word/ detail, this is the view scattered throughout all the following references. admittedly almost nobody (“else”) is proposing the overall vision right now, but again there are flickers and glimmers. in a striking case of burying the lede (but this author is not the only one guilty of this), this great ref was eyepopping for me at the end *(thx much JD again for turning this up/ pointing it out!).*

**[f.16]**(p57)

Given the similarity between classical and quantum equations, it is interesting to ponder what the universe would be like if the vacuum were an elastic solid. Elementary particles would have to be standing or particle-like waves, subject to the wave uncertainty principle. Special relativity would be a consequence of the Lorentz invariance of the wave solutions, and not a property of the space-time in which the waves propagate. [31] The spatial reflection of any solution would also be a solution, so every particle would have an anti-particle that behaves like its mirror image. [32] Measurements would have to change the standing wave configuration from one stable state to another, implying quantization of measurement. Tension induced by twisting of the elastic medium would increase density and decrease wave speed, similar to the way the presence of matter decreases wave speed in general relativity. Hence gravity could be described by an index of refraction. [33–35] In short, an elastic solid universe would be similar in many ways to the one we live in. And although some properties of matter may be impossible to explain using such a classical model, spin angular momentum is not one of them.

so author Close here (2015) explains how much of electron spin dynamics can be explained classically, but doesnt stop there. hes willing to go beyond the specialization/ compartmentalization and look at the **Big Picture™**, to use some **grand induction** along with all the deduction like yin + yang.

re *“although some properties of matter may be impossible to explain…” which ones in particular?* alas this smells like small )( anthropomorphic compartmentalization/ reductionistic bias to me. as already outlined in this blog several times, the one typically cited by physicists, **Bells thm**, despite all the media/ fanfare about airtight theory/ experiments,**[f4]** is actually quite suspect in some very subtle/ tricky details!**[f3.5][f2.18-22]** (Christians work again a JD tip)

physicists in their sometimes schizophrenic moods both simultaneously play up/ play down Bells thm (when rejecting new/ alternative theories, and when giving Bell himself innovation credit, respectively, etc… on that see also my own recent toy problem inquiry [x] which needs votes/ attn). oh and on that note is *anyone* *ever* gonna take La Cour/ Ott 2014 seriously?**[f2.6]** (this blog did in early 2016, even earlier!)**[x]** *or do they just not have as good/ world class PR dept as Mitchell?*

exactly as **Bokulich** indicates/ emphasizes/ pinpoints this work will inherently require a lot of **analogies, metaphors, and bridges**, a style of thinking that many day-to-day routine physicists are *not exactly comfortable with, to say the least!* (they might ridicule it and do at times directly in the hbar chat room, but zen beginners mind is closest to what will be necessary to succeed!) re analogies/ metaphors/ bridges, compare with **Tenev + Horstemeyer** 2016 here (which has now been thoroughly *trashed* in the physics chat room *multiple times* on my advocacy by a motley tag team of self-styled debunkers after *heavy effort* to get *anyone* to seriously read it there! reminds me of the natives + unseen ships phenomenon…[x]) but once found, these can be pushed to the limits. along with T + H a key metaphor/ analogy/ bridge will be the **stress energy tensor** unifying/ unified with a physical medium stress-energy tensor which my feeling/ view naturally has very strong implications for the solution/ resolution of the very deep questions such as physics singularities**[e10]** and the **cosmic censorship hypothesis.**

above the *“whole thing”* is sketched out by the author (Close, *et al*) tentatively, speculatively, as a interesting **thought experiment/ gedanken**.

the idea is a **reality**. **the fluid idea is the reality.**

*what, wait, let me guess, its all “sketchy”? yes @#%& ofc its sketchy, it must necessarily be incomplete, because (among other reasons) einstein literally went to his grave after decades of meandering attempts to solve this stuff! and some of todays top physicists really are clueless on a grand unification theory/ theory of everything also, but ofc would never say such an unspeakable truth out loud! but just remember, its far less sketchy and incomplete as the detractors/ naysayers claim, who will dismiss it out of hand, wrt this, most of whom have a confirmation bias (etc) rivalling the uneducated masses, and wont be bothered to even seriously follow up on any of it. oh, btw, and speaking of brand new books like Becker, have you heard of Hossenfelders? lmgtfy! Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray (yet another top physicist recently dissed in the hbar chat room by anonymous anklebiters, lol!) which immediately reminds me of the objections posted in chat to Tenev + Horstemeyer by another highly educated illustrious aspiring physics phd[x]*

Following your analogy, it’s more like humanity is massively dumping swords and battlecruisers and atomic bomb in the fire and at an industrial scale and you just came up with a kitchen wooden spoon…

to actually unify all this will probably take hundreds of papers and decades of work. it will requiring **building many bridges between current islands** so to speak. yet looking at all this material, collectively/ synthesizing it, aka **connecting the dots,** and am somewhat hopeful at least the early parts of the revolution fully plays out in my remaining lifetime, the traces/ outlines are now appearing. but ofc (as the naysayers will downplay or be oblivious to) *Rome Wasnt Built In a Day™ *

there was already one brief invocation of zen, so how about in closing, a striking mystical quote that professional physicists would utterly cringe at and has been mostly swept under the rug, from the grandfather Bohr himself? hows this for another/ different *copenhagen interpretation*? 😛

For a parallel to the lesson of atomic theory, [we must turn] to those kinds of problems with which thinkers like the Buddha and Lao Tzu have been confronted, when trying to harmonize our position as spectators and actors in the great drama of existence.

–Bohr

**a. becker****b. bokulich****c. duda****d. zitterbewegung****e. soliton-particles****f. QM****f2. QM experiment****f3. bohr-einstein-bohm-bell****f4. mitchell 100K gamers****g. madelung****h. EM + fluid****i. duffield****j. GR/ gravity/ space****k. GR experiment****k2. black hole****l. unification****l2. superfluid****l3. gravity****l4. verlinde****l5. magueijo****m. kuhnian shift/ reactionaries****m2. Lumo**

**a. becker**

- 1. What Is Real?: The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics: Adam Becker: 9780465096053: Amazon.com: Books
- 2. WHAT IS REAL? by Adam Becker | Kirkus Reviews
- 3. Einstein, Bohr and the war over quantum theory : Physics
- 4. Einstein, Bohr and the war over quantum theory : quantum
- 5. Einstein, Bohr and the war over quantum theory
- 6. In a critique of the Copenhagen dogma, a physicist gives voice to “quantum dissidents” | Books, Et Al.
- 7. New light shed on old dispute between Einstein and Bohr – Niels Bohr Institute – University of Copenhagen
- 8. What Is Real? by Adam Becker | Basic Books
- 9. What is Real? | Not Even Wrong
- 10. What Does Quantum Physics Actually Tell Us About the World? – The New York Times
- 11. Quantum’s Leaping Lizards | by David Z Albert | The New York Review of Books

**b. bokulich**

- 1. User Semiclassical – Mathematics Stack Exchange
- 2. ALISA BOKULICH Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism / Berry
- 3. Physics Interest Group Seminar : Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science : U of M
- 4. Three Minute Interview: Alisa Bokulich
- 5. Alisa Bokulich » Philosophy | Blog Archive | Boston University
- 6. “Maxwell’s Method of Physical Analogy and the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics”/ Bokulich
- 7. Louisa Gilder | Penguin Random House
- 8. THE AGE OF ENTANGLEMENT by Louisa Gilder | Kirkus Reviews
- 9. How the Hippies Saved Physics: Science, Counterculture, and the Quantum Revival: David Kaiser: 9780393342314: Amazon.com: Books
- 10. HOW THE HIPPIES SAVED PHYSICS by David Kaiser | Kirkus Reviews
- 11. Physics and Astronomy Calendar – Physics at Minnesota

**c. duda**

- 1. User Jarek Duda – Physics Stack Exchange
- 2. FQXi Community / Topological Solitons of Ellipsoid Field – Particle Menagerie / Duda
- 3. Soliton particle models –topological charge as electric charge/ Duda
- 4. newtonian mechanics – Couder’s walking droplets – what are issues of using its intuitions to interpret quantum analogoues? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 5. quantum mechanics – Does electron have some intrinsic ~$10^{21}$ Hz oscillations (de Broglie’s clock/Zitterbewegung)? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 6. electromagnetism – The problem of infinite energy of electron as point charge? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 7. Classical wave-particle duality objects recreating interference, tunneling, orbit quantization, Zeeman effect, quantum statistics – what are the issues of using intuitions from Couder’s walking droplets to interpret quantum analogues? : Physics
- 8. Michał Gryziński – Wikipedia

**d. zitterbewegung**

- 1. The zitterbewegung interpretation of quantum mechanics | SpringerLink
- 2. Zitterbewegung – Wikipedia
- 3. A Search for the de Broglie Particle Internal Clock by Means of Electron Channeling | SpringerLink

**e. soliton-particles**

- 1. Integrable Systems and Riemann Surfaces Lecture Notes (preliminary version) Boris DUBROVIN
- 2. Defying Common Sense –Success in observing transverse acoustic wave in a liquid — SPring-8 Web Site
- 3. [hep-th/0509216] TASI Lectures on Solitons
- 4. Flux Rule,U(1) Instanton, and Superconductivity | SpringerLink
- 5. Particles as stable topological solitons – IOPscience
- 6. Amazon.com: Physics of Solitons (9780521143608): Thierry Dauxois, Michel Peyrard: Books
- 7. [1612.00110] Solitons and Quantum Behavior
- 8. Can Feynman diagrams be used to represent any perturbation theory? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 9. quantum mechanics – What is a ‘wavicle?’ – Physics Stack Exchange
- 10. Backreaction: Singularities in your Kitchen
- 11. Particles as stable topological solitons – IOPscience
- 12. Black hole electron – Wikipedia

**f. QM**

- 1. Fluid-like properties of the probability densities in quantum mechanics: American Journal of Physics: Vol 69, No 4
- 2. Nine formulations of quantum mechanics: American Journal of Physics: Vol 70, No 3
- 3. quantum mechanics – Do the probability density and the probability current density have a unit – Physics Stack Exchange
- 4. What does the continuity equation for probability in quantum mechanics mean? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 5. Probability current – Wikipedia
- 6. Continuity equation – Wikipedia
- 7. Can fluid dynamics offer insights into quantum mechanics? | MIT News
- 8. Generalized Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations in Quantum Fluid Dynamics | SpringerLink
- 9. Researchers chart the ‘secret’ movement of quantum particles
- 10. These Quantum Droplets Are the Most Dilute Liquids in the Known Universe
- 11. Quantum hydrodynamics – Wikipedia
- 12. Uncertainty principle? It’s not about quantum. – YouTube
- 13. Superdeterminism – Wikipedia
- 14. [1111.3328] On the reality of the quantum state
- 15. Quantum theorem shakes foundations : Nature News & Comment
- 16. Spin Angular Momentum and the Dirac Equation Robert A. Close∗
- 17. A quantum mirage in a pool of oil | Cosmos
- 18. [0709.3812] Pascual Jordan’s resolution of the conundrum of the wave-particle duality of light
- 19. Exploring the realistic nature of the wave function in quantum mechanics
- 20. Researchers chart the ‘secret’ movement of quantum particles
- 21. Shtetl-Optimized » Blog Archive » Interpretive cards (MWI, Bohm, Copenhagen: collect ’em all)
- 22. quantum mechanics – Is it possible to form modern physics using entirely “classical” theory? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 23. [1612.00492] Random Field Quantization Method
- 24. A non-probabilistic quantum theory produces unpredictable results
- 25. [1603.03069] Hydrodynamics of the Physical Vacuum: II. Vorticity dynamics
- 26. [1403.0014] Quantum Mechanics as Classical Physics
- 27. [quant-ph/0604178] The Born Rule in Quantum and Classical Mechanics
- 28. Relational approach to quantum physics – Wikipedia
- 29. New quantum probability rule offers novel perspective of wave function collapse
- 30. Two-state vector formalism – Wikipedia
- 31. theory salon – 2017-11-23 morrison probability fluid
- 32. Understanding Quantum Physics: A User’s Manual, Vol. 1 (v. 1): Michael A. Morrison: 9780137479085: Amazon.com: Books

**f2. QM experiment**

- 1. ‘Perfect liquid’ quark-gluon plasma is the most vortical fluid
- 2. ‘Zeno effect’ verified: Atoms won’t move while you watch | Cornell Chronicle
- 3. Proposed test would offer strongest evidence yet that the quantum state is real
- 4. Physicists provide support for retrocausal quantum theory, in which the future influences the past
- 5. Quantum shift shows itself in coupled light and matter
- 6. A Locally Deterministic, Detector-Based Model of Quantum Measurement | SpringerLink
- 7. Signal-based classical emulation of a universal quantum computer – IOPscience
- 8. The new wave of pilot-wave theory: Physics Today: Vol 68, No 8
- 9. Equivalence of wave–particle duality to entropic uncertainty | Nature Communications
- 10. Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscillators | Nature
- 11. This classic physics experiment could finally reveal the long-awaited ‘theory of everything’
- 12. Spooky Experiments Bring Quantum Weirdness to Nearly Macroscopic Scales
- 13. Spatial entanglement patterns and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in Bose-Einstein condensates | Science
- 14. Spatially distributed multipartite entanglement enables EPR steering of atomic clouds | Science
- 15. Entanglement between two spatially separated atomic modes | Science
- 16. Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators | Nature
- 17. Einstein’s ‘spooky action’ goes massive | Home | Nanotechnology World Network
- 18. [quant-ph/0703179] Disproof of Bell’s Theorem by Clifford Algebra Valued Local Variables
- 19. [1103.1879] Disproof of Bell’s Theorem
- 20. [1704.02876] On a Surprising Oversight by John S. Bell in the Proof of his Famous Theorem
- 21. Libertes Philosophica | The Blog of Joy Christian
- 22. Einstein Centre for Local-Realistic Physics | God does not play dice with the Universe
- 23. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox observed in many-particle system for the first time | University of Basel
- 24. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox observed in many-particle system for the first time
- 25. Entanglement observed in near-macroscopic objects
- 26. Quantum physicists achieve entanglement record
- 27. Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars | Nature Physics
- 28. Can a quantum drum vibrate and stand still at the same time?
- 29. Mind-boggling experiment could finally help physicists explain quantum superposition | Daily Mail Online
- 30. Quantum Physics May Be Even Spookier Than You Think – Scientific American
- 31. The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle | Scientific Reports
- 32. Turning entanglement upside down: A new strategy to investigate quantum entanglement up to thousands of particles — ScienceDaily
- 33. quantum mechanics – Causal explanation of Vaidman’s group “Asking photons where they have been” experiment? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 34. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013) – Asking Photons Where They Have Been
- 35. [1707.09483] Nonlocal Position Changes of a Photon Revealed by Quantum Routers
- 36. Interaction-Free Effects Between Distant Atoms | SpringerLink
- 37. Nil Communication: How to Send a Message without Sending Anything at All – Scientific American
- 38. Physics: Scientists Rewrite Quantum Theory to Do the Impossible and Track ‘Secret’ Particles

**f3. bohr-einstein-bohm-bell**

- 1. Semiclassical Quantum Dynamics and Bohmian Trajectories Christof Sparber
- 2. Amazon.com: The Meaning of the Wave Function: In Search of the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics (9781107124356): Shan Gao: Books
- 3. How many here think the EPR Paradox is wrong now that Bell’s Test Experiments have been validated? : quantum
- 4. Entanglement Video: A Local Hidden Variable Solution : quantum
- 5. Entanglement & Bell Test Experiments: A Local Hidden Variable Solution – YouTube
- 6. Quantum (Un)speakables: R.A. Bertlmann, A. Zeilinger: 9783540427568: Amazon.com: Books
- 7. Quantum [Un]Speakables II: Half a Century of Bell’s Theorem (The Frontiers Collection): Reinhold Bertlmann, Anton Zeilinger: 9783319389851: Amazon.com: Books
- 8. classical mechanics – What makes a theory “Quantum”? – Physics Stack Exchange

**f4. mitchell 100K gamers**

- 1. Einstein Was Wrong about ‘Spooky Action at a Distance,’ According to Study Involving 100,000 Gamers
- 2. This Random Videogame Powers Quantum Entanglement Experiments | WIRED
- 3. The Results of a 100,000-Person Quantum Experiment Seem To Violate Einstein’s Theory of Local Realism – Motherboard
- 4. How the nature of cause and effect will determine the future of quantum technology

**g. madelung**

- 1. [1501.00944] Toward a thermo-hydrodynamic like description of Schrodinger equation via the Madelung formulation and Fisher information
- 2. Madelung equations – Wikipedia
- 3. Solitary waves with the Madelung fluid description: A generalized derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation – ScienceDirect
- 4. [0906.4147] Spin and Madelung fluid
- 5. Solitons in the Madelung’s Fluid – IOPscience
- 6. [1409.7036] Schroedinger vs. Navier-Stokes
- 7. Fluids | Free Full-Text | Rendering the Navier–Stokes Equations for a Compressible Fluid into the Schrödinger Equation for Quantum Mechanics
- 8. Non-Newtonian fluid – Wikipedia
- 9. [1010.2721] Algebra, Topology and Algebraic Topology of 3D Ideal Fluids
- 10. The Effective Field Theory Approach to Fluid Dynamics – Academic Commons

**h. EM + fluid**

- 1. The analogy between matter and electromagnetic waves (PDF Download Available)
- 2. Analogous formulation of electrodynamics and two-dimensional fluid dynamics By Rick Salmon
- 3. The analogy between matter and electromagnetic waves – IOPscience
- 4. [1202.4611] Fluidic Electrodynamics: On parallels between electromagnetic and fluidic inertia
- 5. Hydraulic analogy – Wikipedia
- 6. Analogy between fluid dynamics and electromagnetism – Physics Stack Exchange
- 7. Observing the Average Trajectories of Single Photons in a Two-Slit Interferometer | Science
- 8. Entropy | Free Full-Text | Schroedinger vs. Navier–Stokes
- 9. [1003.0070] A quaternionic unification of electromagnetism and hydrodynamics

**i. duffield**

- 1. RELATIVITY+ : The Theory of Everything: Amazon.co.uk: John Duffield: 9780956097804: Books
- 2. Variable speed of light – Wikipedia
- 3. Polarizable vacuum – Wikipedia
- 4. Foundations of a Theory of Matter. by Gustav Mie.
- 5. Displacement current – Wikipedia
- 6. Biot–Savart law – Wikipedia
- 7. On the Space-Theory of Matter – Wikisource, the free online library
- 8. On Physical Lines of Force – Wikisource, the free online library
- 9. The h Bar – 2018-03-29 (page 3 of 4)
- 10. Physics Discussion Forum – How the universe works
- 11. THE PHYSICS DETECTIVE – …perhaps the past may teach us…
- 12. johnduffieldblog | Fundamental physics
- 13. Why did I get chat suspended for a year? – Physics Meta Stack Exchange
- 14. Open justice v secret police – Physics Meta Stack Exchange
- 15. Why do I keep getting kicked from chat? – Physics Meta Stack Exchange
- 16. User 0celo7 – Physics Meta Stack Exchange
- 17. User John Duffield – Physics Meta Stack Exchange

**j. GR/ gravity/ space**

- 1. ‘NO SUCCESS LIKE FAILURE . . . ’: EINSTEIN’S QUEST FOR GENERAL RELATIVITY, 1907–1920 MICHEL JANSSEN
- 2. Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations: Physics Today: Vol 68, No 11
- 3. To Test Einstein’s Equations, Poke a Black Hole | Quanta Magazine
- 4. [0904.4184] Catalogue of Spacetimes
- 5. Where Gravity Is Weak and Naked Singularities Are Verboten | Quanta Magazine

**k. GR experiment**

- 1. Physicists say they’ve manipulated ‘pure nothingness’ and observed the fallout
- 2. Physicists may have just manipulated ‘pure nothingness’ | MNN – Mother Nature Network
- 3. First Signs of Weird Quantum Property of Empty Space? | ESO United States
- 4. First signs of weird quantum property of empty space?
- 5. First signs of weird quantum property of empty space? Neutron star may confirm 80-year-old prediction about the vacuum — ScienceDaily
- 6. We just got the first real evidence of a strange quantum distortion in empty space – ScienceAlert
- 7. Witness gravity’s quantum side in the lab : Nature News & Comment
- 8. Neutron Star’s Intense Magnetic Field Causes “Virtual Particles” to Spring In and Out of Existence
- 9. Rumours swell over new kind of gravitational-wave sighting : Nature News & Comment
- 10. What Happens When Two Neutron Stars Collide? Scientific Revolution | WIRED
- 11. Backreaction: Nature magazine publishes comment on quantum gravity phenomenology, demonstrates failure of editorial oversight
- 12. What Quantum Gravity Really Needs
- 13. general relativity – Equivalence principle and the meaning of the coordinate speed of light – Physics Stack Exchange
- 14. general relativity – Does light really travel more slowly near a massive body? – Physics Stack Exchange

**k2. black hole**

- 1. Black hole made in the lab shows signs of quantum entanglement | New Scientist
- 2. Scientists make waves with black hole research – The University of Nottingham
- 3. [1510.00621] Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole
- 4. Jeff Steinhauer Atomic Physics Laboratory
- 5. Black-hole laser edges closer to testing Hawking | New Scientist
- 6. Physics adventures down the superfluid supersonic black hole | New Scientist
- 7. Gravitational vortex provides new way to study matter close to a black hole | University of Cambridge
- 8. What Sonic Black Holes Say About the Real Deal | WIRED
- 9. Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entanglement in an analogue black hole | Nature Physics
- 10. Dark Matter May Be Trapped in All the Black Holes
- 11. Mathematicians Disprove Conjecture Made to Save Black Holes | Quanta Magazine

**l. unification**

- 1. Gravity may be created by strange flashes in the quantum realm | New Scientist
- 2. fluid dynamics – Will a proof of the existence and smoothness of the Navier-Stokes equations contribute to a GUT? – Physics Stack Exchange
- 3. Wheeler–DeWitt equation – Wikipedia
- 4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 151301 (2014) – Astrophysical Constraints on Planck Scale Dissipative Phenomena
- 5. DEAN RICKLES QUANTUM GRAVITY MEETS &HPS
- 6. Dark fluid – Wikipedia
- 7. The deconstructed Standard Model equation | symmetry magazine
- 8. The h Bar – 2017-11-03 (page 2 of 3) dewitt/ stiff elastic medium
- 9. The Battle Between Gravity and Quantum Physics, as Told by Craig Hogan and Lee Smolin
- 10. Geometrodynamics – Wikipedia
- 11. Quantum foam – Wikipedia
- 12. Magnetohydrodynamics – Wikipedia
- 13. Cosmic censorship hypothesis – Wikipedia
- 14. Naked singularity – Wikipedia

**l2. superfluid**

- 1. If Spacetime Were a Superfluid, Would It Unify Physics—or Is the Theory All Wet? – Scientific American
- 2. Spacetime Might Be a Superfluid, and That Could Help Explain Gravity — NOVA Next | PBS
- 3. Superfluid vacuum theory – Wikipedia
- 4. Liquid spacetime: What if spacetime were a kind of fluid? — ScienceDaily
- 5. [1012.0119] Entropy density of spacetime and the Navier-Stokes fluid dynamics of null surfaces
- 6. [1404.0176] Fluid dynamics on ultrastatic spacetimes and dual black holes
- 7. [0712.2456] Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics from Gravity
- 8. Liquid spacetime: A very slippery superfluid, that’s what spacetime could be like
- 9. [1206.3982] Noncommutative fluid dynamics in the Snyder space-time
- 10. Hypothetical role of quantum space superfluid dynamics in the physics of particles and fundamental interactions. Marco Fedi
- 11. Quantum spacetime fluid dynamics of particles and fundamental interactions. Marco Fedi

**l3. gravity**

- 1. From Fluid Dynamics to Gravity and Back | Institute for Advanced Study
- 2. The Fluid-Gravity Correspondence QMAP: Centr for Quantum Matematcs & Physics / UCDavis
- 3. [0905.4352] Gravity & Hydrodynamics: Lectures on the fluid-gravity correspondence
- 4. [gr-qc/0505065] Analogue Gravity
- 5. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 363 (1957) – Gravitation without a Principle of Equivalence
- 6. Stress–energy–momentum pseudotensor – Wikipedia

**l4. verlinde**

- 1. Cosmos on Nautilus: Maybe Dark Matter Is All Just a Big Mistake
- 2. Backreaction: Is Verlinde’s Emergent Gravity compatible with General Relativity?
- 3. Diving deep into the world of emergent gravity | Ars Technica
- 4. String Theory Meets Loop Quantum Gravity | Quanta Magazine
- 5. Researchers Check Space-Time to See if It’s Made of Quantum Bits | Quanta Magazine
- 6. Erik Verlinde’s Gravity Minus Dark Matter | Quanta Magazine
- 7. Are Space, Time, And Gravity All Just Illusions?
- 8. The Man Who’s Trying to Kill Dark Matter | WIRED
- 9. The case against dark matter | Astronomy.com

**l5. magueijo**

- 1. Faster Than the Speed of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation: Joao Magueijo: 9781422358832: Amazon.com: Books
- 2. Review: Faster Than the Speed of Light by João Magueijo | Books | The Guardian
- 3. ‘Faster Than the Speed of Light’ – The New York Times
- 4. Theory challenging Einstein’s view on speed of light could soon be tested | Science | The Guardian
- 5. Theory that challenges Einstein’s physics could soon be put to the test
- 6. [0705.4507] Comments on “Note on varying speed of light theories”

**m. kuhnian shift/ reactionaries**

- 1. Groupthink – Wikipedia
- 2. Confirmation bias – Wikipedia
- 3. Bandwagon effect – Wikipedia
- 4. List of fallacies – Wikipedia
- 5. List of cognitive biases – Wikipedia
- 6. User bolbteppa – Mathematics Stack Exchange
- 7. User John Rennie – Physics Stack Exchange
- 8. User ACuriousMind – Physics Stack Exchange
- 9. User DanielSank – Physics Stack Exchange

**m2. Lumo**

- 1. The Reference Frame: Bell’s and sycophants’ criticism of von Neumann’s hidden-variable no-go theorem is misguided
- 2. The Reference Frame: Bohmian mechanics, a ludicrous caricature of Nature
- 3. The Reference Frame: Bohmists & segregation of primitive and contextual observables
- 4. The Reference Frame: Dumb tirades about a “liar paradox” in quantum mechanics
- 5. The Reference Frame: Why gravity can’t be entropic
- 6. The Reference Frame: Garrett Lisi: An exceptionally simple theory of everything
- 7. The Reference Frame: Common crackpots’ errors
- 8. The Reference Frame: A future proof of \(P=NP\) or \(P\neq NP\) may be far-reaching or not so much
- 9. The Reference Frame: A future proof of \(P=NP\) or \(P!\neq NP\) may be far-reaching or not so much · The Reference Frame · Disqus

duffieldjohnThere’s some good stuff here vzn. You’ll be getting yourself into trouble with it, mark my words.

duffieldjohnNo, not all the feedback is “in good faith”.