hi all. filed under “the joy and pain (& yin & yang) of research”. 😦 🙂 microsoft unceremoniously announced the abrupt/ brusque closure of the silicon valley CS research laboratory which ran for about ~1½ decade. actually there does not seem to be any official announcement anywhere. one cannot even find a list of the researchers and their papers any more, apparently the web page previously documented it was vaporized also. “the memory hole”! a bit orwellian even! easy come, easy go! (and this is also quite a jarring contrast/ juxtaposition wrt just last blogging about Google buying up an entire QM computing lab!) updated: MS page back up [a14]
this is a harsh moment but certainly not an unprecedented one. commercial/ industrial research labs have tended to become very rare in the last few decades, an endangered species. this closure triggered sizeable ripples, commentary, and reflections in the (T)CS blogosphere including by many insiders, past visitors, and admirers posting comments, tributes, & memories.[a] among them [a1] is esp notable/ standout as Omer Reingold announces the closure in a very classy way with lots of responses & reminiscing, thoughtful, even touching comments. a sort of mini blog eulogy. a test of that old aphorism-verging-on-canard which might feel like little solace to the victims: “when one door closes, another opens” also heard in some recent pop music (ah, that new near-saccharine-upbeat Katy Perry song that mixes more metaphors than even me?).
Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together. —Marilyn Monroe
some marvelled at how MS has recently made major acquisitions and just agreed to a ~$2½ BILLION dollar acquisition of the Minecraft video game. yeah business is not always rational. what takes a long time to build up can be torn down in an instant.
in my youth MS had the regal imperial buzz of Google or Facebook today. times change! knew myself that this kind of energy is unsustainable. have studied MS closely in my life & read multiple bios of Gates. to put it diplomatically, Ballmer seemed just not to have the same strategic instincts as Gates. he just couldnt make anything stick after over a decade of crushingly expensive tries. Bing, Surface tablet, windows phone. however, in his defense, the tech industry is one of the most fastpaced and darwinian in existence.
almost ~1½ decade ago, was laid off in a vaguely similar fashion from a dotcom. it was a very cool R&D job involving latent semantic analysis and latent semantic indexing technologies, a parallel beowulf (linux) cluster (when they were still quite novel), and parallel algorithms. wow! at the time thought it was my dream job. it lasted a little over a year and then the entire dept shut down instantly throwing out 7 employees incl the manager/ head, about ~½ year after 911.
to me some of this is symptomatic of the winner-take-all capitalism that has been in sway for several decades and goes under the economic guise of so-called “supply side economics” but which really is turning out to be just a cover story for extreme wealth inequality intertwined with crony capitalism and near-plutocracy. 👿 (ofc thats not a topic for polite company! shew!)
there is a fundamental catch 22 with R&D. if one can figure out how to build a product, then one should just go about building that product. but in a way there is actually no money in figuring out how to build the product, only in the finished, materialized product. and lots of R&D is not always product oriented nor can it be. capitalism generates intense pressure to commoditize every product.
so in general science and capitalism do not really mix comfortably/ smoothly. science needs to be publicly funded. but as unchecked capitalism devours most of the culture, science will suffer. the abstract “value” of science is inestimable to humanity but the *monetary* value looked at through bureacratic/ administrative/ accounting eyes is highly questionable.
R&D does seem to be similar to silicon valley principles in that one has to throw money at a lot of projects before any one in particular can yield returns, but apriori this is not clear which will be monetizable. and one has to “swallow ones losses” on all the other stuff that might have looked promising or have potential in the past but can turn out to be dead ends with 2020 hindsight.
but, there is not a big reason to be overly dejected or negative about this news. we seem to be in the midst/ living thru a golden age of computer science research and theoretical research in general. there are some estimates eg that “there are more mathematicians alive now than have lived in the entire past” and maybe the same goes for other theoretical areas such as computer science. rumors are that not everyone at the MS lab lost their job and there are many other MS CS labs continuing around the world so far unaffected; apparently among them the silicon valley lab “drew the short straw” somehow.[a12]
scientific research, knowledge, and discovery is one of the most impressive and valuable aspects of our highly civilized, technological, complex age. it can be uneven at times, but its sheer span is massive and at times nearly incomprehensible (sounds dramatic or maybe exaggerated but eg imagine how many (T)CS papers are published yearly, internationally, and their contents and range of topics; it surely numbers in the thousands or more). its also become much more international in recent times. there are countless many making maybe not all “thriving” but at least “surviving” careers of it.[b]
my particular interest of (T)CS research seems to be thriving quite well in academia and industry and has been very blessed by a high profile sponsor Simons who has had a major effect/ impact on the field.[c][e]
at times like this its sometimes helpful or inspiring to look back at how far TCS has progressed in just a few decades from its illustrious origins & one can derive major confidence that this trend will continue long into the future. lets not forget its recently uncovered elite founding fathers such as Godel, Nash, Kolmogorov.[d]
update 9/29. hey cyberspace thx for all the hits. spking of “going back to roots,” adding another bonus angle. MSResearch was founded by a famous 1991 memo [g1] by Myhrvold directed partly at founder/CEO Gates. Myhrvold is a very colorful character, another scandalous billionaire. he started a large company Intellectual Ventures accused of so-called “patent trolling”.[g]
update 10/14. theory community responds with letter sent to Microsoft referring to “damage” to its reputation, call for dialog, (etc) and signed by 28 leading researchers, & many further endorsements by leading researchers in comments.[a15]
update 10/22. Harry Shum, MS Executive Vice President, Technology & Research responds, reaffirming commitment.[a16]
a. msr/svc
- 1. Farewell Microsoft-Research Silicon Valley Lab | Windows On Theory
- 2. Riding the Wheel of Samsara | Windows On Theory
- 3. Microsoft to close Microsoft Research lab in Silicon Valley | ZDNet
- 4. A thank you to MSR/SVC | Turing’s Invisible Hand
- 5. Microsoft Research Silicon Valley Campus | in theory
- 6. Computational Complexity: Goodbye MSR-SVC
- 7. My Biased Coin: On Academia vs. Industry…. MSR SVC Closing
- 8. Shtetl-Optimized » Blog Archive » Microsoft SVC
- 9. A Perspective on Computing Research Management / Levin
- 10. Microsoft Shuts Down Silicon Valley Research Lab, Amid Broader Layoffs / Recode
- 11. Microsoft shuts down research labs in Silicon Valley which includes among other top scientists the current Turing Award winner / Reddit thread/comments
- 12. Microsoft research labs worldwide
- 13. MS closes SVC RJLipton blog
- 14. Microsoft Research Silicon Valley
- 15. Letter re closing of Microsoft Research Silicon Valley / TheoryMatters blog
- 16. Microsoft Open Letter to Academic Research Community / MS Research connections blog
- 17. How Microsoft’s 1 Percenters Balance Basic Research with Short-Term Success / Scientific american interview of research head Peter Lee
- 18. Out the Window
b. phd/career
- 1. The Joy of Research » American Scientist
- 2. Editor’s Message: The Joy of Research / Keshav
- 3. Building a Research Career / Berman
- 4. The importance of stupidity in scientific research
- 5. Advice to aspiring scientists (by Oded Goldreich)
- 6. How to Be a Successful PhD Student
- 7. Amazon.com: A PhD Is Not Enough!: A Guide to Survival in Science eBook: Peter J. Feibelman: Kindle Store
- 8. Career advice | What’s new / Terence Tao
- 9. PHD Comics: The Joy of Research
c. tcs topic
- 1. How to do Research At the MIT AI Lab
- 2. Farewell Microsoft-Research Silicon Valley Lab | Windows On Theory
- 3. Research-Life Stories | Windows On Theory
- 4. The Explosive Growth of Postdocs in Computer Science | February 2013 | Communications of the ACM
- 5. soft question – How to find interesting research problems – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 6. soft question – How to find a specific research topic to concentrate on? – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 7. big list – Major unsolved problems in theoretical computer science? – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 8. ds.algorithms – Algorithms from the Book. – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 9. ds.algorithms – Core algorithms deployed – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 10. soft question – Beautiful results in TCS – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 11. soft question – What does research in theoretical computer science involve? – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 12. soft question – What do you do when you cannot make progress on the problem you have been working on? – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 13. research – How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student? – Academia Stack Exchange
- 14. publishing – I believe I have solved a famous open problem. How do I convince people in the field that I am not a crank? – Academia Stack Exchange
- 15. soft question – TCS conferences for undergraduate students? – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 16. soft question – Why go to theoretical computer science/research? – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 17. soft question – TCS conferences for undergraduate students? – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
d. TCS origins
- 1. The Gödel Letter | Gödel’s Lost Letter and P=NP
- 2. John Nash’s Letter to the NSA | Turing’s Invisible Hand
- 3. 2012 Press Release – National Cryptologic Museum Opens New Exhibit on Dr. John Nash
- 4. John Nash letter to NSA
- 5. cc.complexity theory – Arguments for/against Kolmogorov’s conjecture about the circuit complexity of P – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 6. cc.complexity theory – Kolmogorov’s conjecture that $P$ has linear-size circuits – Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange
- 7. reference request – Is computer science a branch of mathematics? – Mathematics Stack Exchange
- 8. 2012 Press Release – National Cryptologic Museum Opens New Exhibit on Dr. John Nash
e. simons
- 1. Billionaires With Big Ideas Are Privatizing American Science – NYTimes.com
- 2. Inside the Simons Institute | Scheder | Bulletin of EATCS
- 3. How to Build a Bad Research Center | March 2014 | Communications of the ACM
- 4. A Retrospective Report of the Simons Institute Visions on The Theory of Computing Symposium » CCC Blog
- 5. A Billionaire Mathematician’s Life of Ferocious Curiosity – NYTimes.com
f. misc
- 1. The Idea Factory: Learning to Think at MIT – Kindle edition by Pepper White. Professional & Technical Kindle eBooks @ Amazon.com.
- 2. xkcd: Academia vs. Business
- 3. The Ghost of Invention: A Visit to Bell Labs | WIRED
- 4. Stanford Promises Not to Use Google Money for Privacy Research – ProPublica
- 5. Newly Tenured Professor Now Inspired To Work Harder Than Ever | The Onion – America’s Finest News Source
- 6. xkcd: Academia vs. Business
- 7. The Neuroscience of Mathematical Beauty | Beautiful Minds, Scientific American Blog Network
g. myhrvold/patent troll
- 1. The Memo That Spawned Microsoft Research—and Its Lessons for Today | Xconomy
- 2. Nathan Myhrvold, patent troll? Check out his nuclear reactor – CNET
- 3. Inside Intellectual Ventures, the most hated company in tech – CNET
- 4. Intellectual Ventures And The War Over Software Patents : Planet Money : NPR
- 5. For world’s biggest troll, first patent case ends up in tatters | Ars Technica
- 6. An audience with the King of the Patent Trolls
- 7. Tech Guru Riles the Industry By Seeking Huge Patent Fees – WSJ
- 8. Who Is Nathan Myhrvold – Business Insider
- 9. Nathan Myhrvold: How a Geek Grills a Burger – MensJournal.com